Tools & Calculators
By HDFC SKY | Updated at: Jul 28, 2025 11:02 AM IST
Summary

When it comes to building wealth through investments, the debate between active vs passive investing remains a hot topic. It’s like you’re standing at a crossroads of investment strategies, each path leading to potentially different financial destinations.
On one side, you have active investing – like a skilled captain navigating through market waves, making constant adjustments by regularly buying and selling underperforming investments to capture the best opportunities.
On the other side, there’s passive investing – more like setting your ship on a steady course by holding investments long-term, often through mutual or exchange-traded funds and letting the market currents carry you toward your long-term destination.
India’s asset management industry has grown dramatically, with assets under management (AUM) surging to ₹61.2 lakh crore as of June 2024, a remarkable 7x increase from ₹8.3 lakh crore in December 2013. Passive funds now constitute ₹10.2 lakh crore, representing 17% of the market, while active funds dominate with ₹50.9 lakh crore.
The mutual fund industry recorded net inflows of ₹3.25 lakh crore in Q1FY25, driven by active equity funds contributing ₹2.80 lakh crore and passive equity funds ₹45,000 crore. Notably, passive equity claimed 88% of net inflows in its category, highlighting its growing popularity.
Each strategy offers unique advantages and caters to different investor profiles. Let’s explore these two approaches and understand how they fit into your financial journey, with relatable examples tailored for the Indian audience.
Picture a skilled fund manager who spends their days analysing market trends, studying company financials, and making strategic decisions about when to buy or sell investments. This is the essence of an active fund, where the aim is to outperform the market rather than simply match it. The fund manager decides on buying, selling, or holding assets based on market trends and financial analysis.
For instance, suppose Fund X’s manager notices an emerging trend in the technology sector. They might increase the fund’s exposure to promising tech stocks while reducing holdings in sectors they believe will underperform. This hands-on approach involves constantly monitoring and adjusting the portfolio based on market conditions and opportunities.
Think of passive portfolio management as following a pre-determined path, much like a train following its tracks. Instead of trying to beat the market, passive funds aim to mirror it by investing in index funds that track major benchmarks like the Nifty 50 or S&P 500.
Suppose you invest in a passive fund that tracks the Nifty 50. The fund manager’s job is straightforward: replicate the composition of the Nifty 50. If Reliance Industries and TCS gain weightage in the index, the fund automatically adjusts to reflect these changes. Your returns, therefore, align closely with the index performance. By holding fractions of thousands of shares, passive investors benefit from the market’s upward trajectory over time, staying patient through short-term setbacks to achieve steady growth.
The distinction between active and passive investment strategy goes beyond just management style. Here’s how they differ:
| Aspect | Active Investing | Passive Investing |
| Management Style | Actively managed by professionals | Tracks a market index |
| Objective | Beat the market | Match the market |
| Cost | Higher expense ratio (0.5% to 2.5%) due to research and trading | Lower expense ratio (up to 1.25%) due to minimal trading |
| Flexibility | High, allows timely decisions | Limited to index movements |
| Risk | Higher due to market-timing strategies | Lower, as it mirrors the market index |
| Strategy | Involves frequent buying and selling based on market analysis | Investing follows a buy-and-hold approach |
| Return Potential | Can outperform the market | Matches the market returns |
Before choosing between active funds vs passive funds, consider:
The choice depends on the individual’s circumstances. For instance, a passive strategy might be suitable if you’re a young professional starting your investment journey with a long-term horizon. However, an active approach might be worth considering if you’re an experienced investor with a higher risk appetite and seeking potentially higher returns.
The active vs passive investing debate isn’t about declaring one strategy superior to the other. It’s about finding the right approach for your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment timeline. Many successful investors combine both strategies, creating a balanced portfolio that leverages the benefits of each approach.